Alacritty
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
Kitty Terminal is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Alacritty.
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Alacritty compares to 8 alternative apps you can switch to.
TabbyWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Tabby trades Alacritty's raw speed for built-in SSH and split panes in a modern interface, costing significantly more memory.
Iterm2Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--iTerm2 delivers unmatched macOS terminal power for free, but strands cross-platform teams that Alacritty unifies.
Windows T...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Windows Terminal delivers modern UX and WSL integration at zero cost, but sacrifices cross-platform consistency and minimal resource usage.
MobaxtermNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Mobaxterm is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Kitty Terminal and Tabby selected for comparison.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Open Source
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $1,200 estimated migration cost.
--
--
78/100
Kitty fits engineering teams that demand built-in tabs, splits, and image rendering without external tmux dependencies. Developers comfortable with Python-based configuration and extensible frameworks adopt it immediately, but teams prioritizing Rust-based minimalism and zero-dependency binaries will find it unnecessarily heavy. The integrated window management eliminates extra tooling but increases memory usage significantly.
72/100
Tabby suits engineering teams that need integrated SSH clients, serial connections, and split panes without learning tmux. Developers using tiling window managers or low-resource environments will struggle with its Electron-based memory footprint compared to Alacritty's lightweight Rust core.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Kitty Terminal is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 1 week and $1,200 one-time cost.
low
Tabby is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 1 week and $0 one-time cost.
--
42 reviews
--
12 reviews
--
58000 reviews
No migration needed
1 week
High
Kitty Terminal is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 1 week and $1,200 one-time cost.
1 week
High
Tabby is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 1 week and $0 one-time cost.
--
$1,200
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
--
Supports 45 native integrations.
100%
--
--
--
--
You already standardize on this app.
Your team wants built-in multiplexing and image support without managing tmux or screen configurations
Your team wants a terminal with built-in SSH client, tabs, and modern UI without tmux complexity
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
Your team prioritizes minimal dependencies, fastest possible startup, and strict Rust-based toolchains
Your team prioritizes minimalism, GPU acceleration speed, or runs on memory-constrained hardware
