Abrigo Allowance/CECL
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
Sas Risk Management is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Abrigo Allowance/CECL.
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Abrigo Allowance/CECL compares to 34 alternative apps you can switch to.
Sas Risk ...Best FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get powerful stress testing and broader risk tracking, but you will lose simple allowance workflows and need a bigger IT team.
Logicgate...Strong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--LogicGate gives you a full GRC platform (including ESG/audits) but skips CECL’s specialized tools. Abrigo is cheaper and better for credit risk—but LogicGate wins if you need more than just CECL.
TrusteroWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You gain fast SOC 2 prep and AI evidence tracking, but lose all banking reserve and credit loss tools.
HyperproofWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Hyperproof automates general compliance audits, but you will lose banking-specific CECL calculations and credit loss modeling.
ResolverWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Resolver handles broad risk/compliance better than Abrigo, but you’ll lose CECL-specific tools and financial institution integrations. Only switch if you’re okay adding another tool for credit risk.
KpmgWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--KPMG gives you broad GRC and advisory support, but you'll lose loan-specific CECL modeling and reserve tracking.
ApptegaWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get easier security audits and vendor checks, but lose credit loss modeling and banking compliance tools.
AtlasWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Atlas saves you time on audits and policies but drops the CECL math—you’ll need to keep Abrigo or add another tool for credit risk modeling. Think of it as swapping a car for a bike: faster for some t
PiraniWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Pirani replaces Abrigo if you want one tool for *everything* (audits, vendors, risks), but you’ll lose CECL-specific workflows and pay more for less credit-loss focus.
CasewareWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Caseware is a solid audit tool with great workpaper features, but if you need CECL modeling or risk analysis, Abrigo is the clear winner. Switch only if audits are your main focus.
AuditboardWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--AuditBoard saves you from juggling spreadsheets for audits and SOX, but you’ll miss Abrigo’s CECL-specific features. Switch only if you need broader GRC—and can afford the higher price.
Scrut Aut...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Scrut saves time on compliance automation but won’t replace Abrigo’s CECL modeling—you’ll need to use both or find a workaround for reserve calculations.
SprintoWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Sprinto automates compliance checks and audit prep but won’t help you model loan losses or manage CECL reserves.
MindbridgeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--MindBridge finds fraud faster but won’t handle CECL modeling. Use it alongside Abrigo if fraud detection is your biggest pain point.
CreditsafeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Creditsafe gives you external credit data and screening, but you will lose internal reserve modeling and CECL reporting.
AppwardWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Appward handles HR and basic compliance well, but you will lose specialized banking finance tools and audit-ready reserve tracking.
SafeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--SAFE handles cyber threats and vendor risks well, but you will lose all credit loss modeling and CECL compliance tools.
OneleetWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Oneleet is cheaper and automates compliance checks, but it won’t touch your CECL reserves or lending risk tools. Switch only if you’re leaving banking behind.
DrataWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Drata saves time on security audits but drops the ball on CECL. Switch only if you’re okay losing your credit risk tools for automated compliance evidence collection.
Sai360Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--SAI360 handles compliance chaos but drops CECL deep dives—switch only if you’re okay losing credit risk features for a broader (and pricier) GRC umbrella.
Ideagen Q...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Ideagen Quality Management is great for audits and supplier tracking, but you’ll lose CECL modeling and credit risk tools—stick with Abrigo if you’re in finance.
Securefra...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Secureframe saves time on security audits but won’t touch your CECL work. Switch if compliance is your biggest pain; stay with Abrigo if credit risk modeling is your priority.
Strike Gr...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Strike Graph is a compliance powerhouse for security teams but useless for CECL calculations. If you need to track credit losses or reserves, Abrigo is the only option—Strike Graph won’t cut it.
Origami R...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Origami Risk is for insurance teams, not banks. You’d gain claims/policy tools but lose CECL calculations, risk analysis, and lending-specific compliance—don’t switch unless you’re leaving credit risk
OsapiensWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--osapiens is a great ESG tool but won’t touch your CECL workflows. Switch only if you’re adding sustainability reporting and can rebuild credit risk processes elsewhere.
OsanoWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Osano handles privacy compliance like a champ but won’t touch CECL or credit risk. If you’re stuck between the two, you’ll need both tools—or find something hybrid.
RiskreconWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--RiskRecon is great for cyber risk monitoring but won’t replace Abrigo for credit loss modeling or CECL workflows. You’ll get vendor security scores and alerts, but lose all loan/portfolio tools.
Etq Relia...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--ETQ Reliance is great for quality/audit teams but won’t cut it for CECL. You’d lose all the finance-specific tools and gain QMS features you don’t need.
EcovadisWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--EcoVadis helps with ESG/supply chain risks but won’t replace Abrigo’s CECL tools—you’d lose credit loss modeling and audit trails.
NcontractsWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Ncontracts is a solid pick for vendor/contract risk, but you’ll need to keep Abrigo for CECL. Think of it as adding a co-pilot for one part of your workflow, not a full replacement.
Diligent ...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Diligent Boards is a great boardroom tool but won’t cut it for CECL compliance. Switch if you want digital board books and secure voting, but you’ll lose all the financial modeling and reserve managem
FastWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--FAST simplifies compliance workflows but drops CECL tools entirely. Switch only if you’re okay losing reserve calculations and risk analysis.
VantaWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Vanta is great for security audits but won’t replace Abrigo’s credit risk tools. If you’re a bank or lender, you’ll need both—or find a different solution.
Process S...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Process Street is cheaper and simpler for basic workflows, but you’ll lose all your CECL tools and risk analysis. Only switch if you’re okay dropping the heavy compliance features.Sas Risk Management and Logicgate Risk Cloud selected for comparison.
--
Custom Enterprise Plan
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $150,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $8,000 estimated migration cost.
--
52/100
This platform is built for large financial institutions with dedicated risk, finance, and compliance teams. It handles heavy data and complex modeling, so it will overwhelm smaller teams or those without technical staff. If you just need basic tracking, this is overkill.
55/100
LogicGate Risk Cloud is a strong fit if your team handles *more* than just CECL compliance—like third-party risks, audits, or ESG reporting. It’s flexible for teams that want to automate workflows without coding, but it’s overkill if you only need CECL modeling and don’t use other GRC features. Abrigo stays focused on credit loss calculations, which is simpler if that’s your only priority.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Sas Risk Management is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 16 weeks and $150,000 one-time cost.
low
Logicgate Risk Cloud is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.
--
4.3/5.0
195 reviews
4.6/5.0
1200 reviews
No migration needed
16 weeks
Medium
Sas Risk Management is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 16 weeks and $150,000 one-time cost.
8 weeks
Low
Logicgate Risk Cloud is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.
--
$150,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$8,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
Supports 180 native integrations.
--
Supports 150 native integrations.
100%
65%
50%
You already standardize on this app.
Your bank has a large risk team and needs to run complex stress tests and track multiple risk types at once.
You manage risks beyond CECL (like audits, third-party vendors, or ESG) and want a flexible, no-code GRC tool.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You mainly need to calculate CECL reserves and manage allowance approvals without heavy IT support.
Your team’s *only* job is CECL compliance—LogicGate will feel bloated and lack the niche features Abrigo has.
