A10 Networks
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
Google Cloud Load Balancing is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for A10 Networks.
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how A10 Networks compares to 4 alternative apps you can switch to.
Google Cl...Best FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Switch if you want Google to handle your traffic scaling automatically, but stick with A10 if you need to manage your own hardware or private data centers.
Azure Tra...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get simple, reliable traffic routing in Azure, but lose the security and advanced load balancing features of A10 Networks.
Azure Loa...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Azure Load Balancer is cheaper and native if you are all-in on Microsoft, but you'll lose advanced security features like a web application firewall.
Palo Alto...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get stronger threat prevention but lose load balancing and traffic optimization — pick this if security is your top priority.Google Cloud Load Balancing and Azure Traffic Manager selected for comparison.
--
Thunder ADC Virtual
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $25,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $2,000 estimated migration cost.
--
75/100
Google Cloud Load Balancing is a powerhouse for teams that need to handle massive traffic spikes without managing physical hardware. It integrates perfectly with the rest of the Google ecosystem, making it a natural choice if your apps already live there.
55/100
Azure Traffic Manager works well if you're already using Azure and need simple traffic routing. It's less suited for teams needing advanced security features like DDoS protection or web application firewalls.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Google Cloud Load Balancing is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $25,000 one-time cost.
low
Azure Traffic Manager is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $2,000 one-time cost.
--
4.4/5.0
1250 reviews
4.4/5.0
1840 reviews
No migration needed
8 weeks
Medium
Google Cloud Load Balancing is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $25,000 one-time cost.
4 weeks
Medium
Azure Traffic Manager is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $2,000 one-time cost.
--
$25,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$2,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
Supports 50 native integrations.
--
Supports 50 native integrations.
100%
60%
40%
You already standardize on this app.
You want to stop managing physical hardware and let Google handle your traffic scaling automatically.
You're already using Azure and just need to route traffic between regions based on location or performance
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You need to keep your traffic management tools on your own physical servers or in a private data center.
You need DDoS protection, web application firewalls, or advanced traffic inspection — Azure Traffic Manager doesn't do those
