Doow
Doow
Sign up
ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS

1964 Alternatives

Should you replace 1964?

Apollo.Io is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for 1964.

1964

Current
Seat-based Payg
0/5
Annual cost
--
Seats assigned
--

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

1964 alternatives

See how 1964 compares to 2 alternative apps you can switch to.

Apollo.IoBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get a massive contact list and easy email automation, but you will lose call recording and deep deal tracking.
ZoominfoStrong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get deeper company and contact data with ZoomInfo, but lose any ability to track product usage or feature adoption.

Apollo.Io and Zoominfo selected for comparison.

Annual costTotal subscription cost for each app, shown for the selected billing period.
1964

--

Public pricing

Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.

Apollo.Io

--

Public pricing

Public catalog pricing estimate.

Zoominfo

--

Public pricing

Public catalog pricing estimate.

3-Year Net SavingEstimated savings over three years after migration and setup costs.
1964

$0

No migration in the current app baseline.

Apollo.Io

--

After $500 estimated migration cost.

Zoominfo

--

After $7,500 estimated migration cost.

Team Fit ScoreHow closely the app matches the teams, workflows, and usage patterns currently in place.
1964

--

Apollo.Io

75/100

Apollo shines for teams that need a massive contact database and automated email sequences. It handles prospecting and basic lead scoring well. However, it falls short on detailed call recording analysis and advanced revenue attribution.

Zoominfo

75/100

ZoomInfo works best for sales and marketing teams focused on finding and contacting leads. It's less useful for product teams who need usage analytics or feature adoption data. The platform is built around outbound sales, not product-led growth.

Adoption RiskExpected friction, training effort, and behavior change needed to move teams onto the alternative.
1964

--

Public adoption signal for the current app.

Apollo.Io

low

Apollo.Io is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $500 one-time cost.

Zoominfo

low

Zoominfo is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $7,500 one-time cost.

User satisfactionAvailable rating and review signal for team sentiment around the app.
1964

--

15600 reviews

Apollo.Io

4.7/5.0

11500 reviews

Zoominfo

--

12430 reviews

Timeline & DisruptionExpected migration duration and disruption to normal workflows.
1964

No migration needed

Apollo.Io

2 weeks

Medium

Apollo.Io is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $500 one-time cost.

Zoominfo

4 weeks

Medium

Zoominfo is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $7,500 one-time cost.

Setup & trainingOne-time implementation, enablement, and training investment required.
1964

--

Apollo.Io

$500

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Zoominfo

$7,500

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Integration CoverageHow much of the current integration and workflow surface is covered by the app.
1964

100%

Supports 140 native integrations.

Apollo.Io

100%

Supports 210 native integrations.

Zoominfo

36%

Supports 50 native integrations.

Feature Match (%)How closely the app matches current feature needs, including notable gaps or risks.
1964

100%

Apollo.Io

68%

  • No built-in call recording or conversation intelligence.
  • Limited advanced company filtering and tech stack tracking.
  • Basic team analytics compared to dedicated revenue platforms.
Zoominfo

70%

  • No built-in product usage tracking
  • Limited support for in-app messaging or feature adoption workflows
  • Conversation intelligence focused on calls, not product interactions
CertificationsSecurity, privacy, and compliance certifications available for each app.
1964
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRISO 27001CCPAPCI DSS
Apollo.Io
SOC 2 Type IIGDPR
Zoominfo
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCCPA
Choose This IfThe conditions where keeping or switching to this app is likely to make sense.
1964

You already standardize on this app.

Apollo.Io

Your team needs a huge contact database and wants to automate email outreach without juggling multiple tools.

Zoominfo

Your team spends most of its time finding leads, calling prospects, and sending outreach sequences

Avoid This IfThe conditions where this app is likely to create cost, workflow, or adoption risk.
1964

Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.

Apollo.Io

You rely on detailed call recordings and want to see exactly how deals move through your sales process.

Zoominfo

You need to see how people use your product after they sign up or want to trigger messages based on in-app behavior