Microsoft Teams
Current- Annual cost
- $48
- Seats assigned
- $48/yr
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Slack is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Microsoft Teams.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Microsoft Teams compares to 12 alternative apps you can switch to.
SlackBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Slack wins on async workflow flexibility but loses on unified communications depth.
ZoomStrong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Zoom wins on video fidelity and webinar scale but requires separate phone licenses to match Teams' bundled communications stack.
WireWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Wire trades ecosystem convenience for cryptographic privacy, making it the Swiss vault of team collaboration at roughly twice the cost.
Rocket.Ch...Worth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Trade Microsoft's walled garden for air-gapped sovereignty—Rocket.Chat delivers secure chat with total data control and open-source flexibility.
MattermostWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Trade Microsoft’s ecosystem for sovereign data control and DevOps-native workflows.
ElementNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Element is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
ZulipNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Zulip is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Slack and Zoom selected for comparison.
$48
Microsoft Teams Essentials ($4/month)
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Basic
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $4,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $3,200 estimated migration cost.
--
70/100
Slack excels as a channel-based messaging hub with industry-leading third-party integrations, making it superior for asynchronous collaboration and software-driven workflows. However, it lacks the native PSTN calling, advanced video conferencing, and deep Microsoft 365 integration that Teams provides out-of-the-box.
68/100
Zoom delivers superior video quality and reliability for client-facing meetings and large-scale webinars compared to Teams. It fits organizations that prioritize communication with external partners over deep internal document collaboration. However, teams embedded in Microsoft 365 will encounter friction with file workflows and persistent chat threading.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Slack is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
low
Zoom is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 3 weeks and $3,200 one-time cost.
4.4/5.0
28600 reviews
4.5/5.0
54000 reviews
--
550000 reviews
No migration needed
4 weeks
Medium
Slack is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
3 weeks
Medium
Zoom is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 3 weeks and $3,200 one-time cost.
--
$4,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$3,200
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 1,800 native integrations.
100%
Supports 2,600 native integrations.
100%
Supports 2,500 native integrations.
100%
65%
65%
You already standardize on this app.
Your team prioritizes channel-based messaging and extensive third-party integrations over native telephony
You prioritize video reliability and external client meetings over deep document collaboration
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You require integrated PSTN calling or host large video meetings with advanced production features
You rely on threaded channel conversations and native Office 365 real-time co-authoring
