GitHub Copilot
Current- Annual cost
- $100
- Seats assigned
- $100/yr
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Apex is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for GitHub Copilot.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how GitHub Copilot compares to 15 alternative apps you can switch to.
ApexBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Enterprise fortress approach with custom model control versus Copilot's ecosystem convenience
Amazon Q ...Strong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get deep AWS and security help, but you lose Copilot's multi-model chat and broader language support.
Ibm Watso...Strong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--You get better audit trails and legacy code help, but lose the fast, real-time typing suggestions developers love.
GeminiWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Google's multimodal powerhouse trades deep IDE integration for versatility across documents, images, and code.
ReplitWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Replit trades local IDE flexibility for instant cloud collaboration with integrated AI assistance and deployment.
CursorWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Cursor enables multi-file AI refactoring through Composer, but forces a painful IDE migration that Copilot's plugin architecture avoids entirely.
KiroWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Kiro trades Copilot's convenience for data sovereignty — same AI power, but your source code never leaves your infrastructure.
Claude Co...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Claude Code sacrifices seamless IDE integration for autonomous terminal execution—pay for what you use, only if your team tolerates context switching.
OpencodeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Eliminate per-seat fees and data leakage risks entirely, but trade Copilot's polish for DIY infrastructure overhead.
VoidWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Void cuts subscription costs to zero and keeps code on-premises, but dumps the LLM infrastructure burden onto your team.
CodexNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Codex is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
Firebase ...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Firebase Studio is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Apex and Amazon Q Developer selected for comparison.
$120
Individual ($10/month)
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Amazon Q Developer Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
--
--
68/100
Organizations prioritizing data privacy and proprietary model hosting will find Apex's enterprise controls and secure code handling align with strict compliance requirements. The platform suits teams needing granular configuration over AI behavior rather than turnkey consumer solutions.
70/100
Amazon Q Developer shines when your stack runs on AWS. It gives you built-in help for cloud architecture and security scanning. But it falls short if you code mostly outside the AWS ecosystem.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
medium
Apex is a low-complexity migration.
low
Amazon Q Developer is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 1 week and $0 one-time cost.
4.5/5.0
8500 reviews
4.5/5.0
120 reviews
4.6/5.0
3500 reviews
No migration needed
--
Low
Apex is a low-complexity migration.
1 week
Medium
Amazon Q Developer is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 1 week and $0 one-time cost.
--
--
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
--
Supports 15 native integrations.
100%
80%
70%
--
You already standardize on this app.
You require enterprise-grade security controls and custom model deployment behind your firewall
Your team lives in AWS and needs help with infrastructure or security scanning.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You rely heavily on GitHub ecosystem integration and CLI assistance workflows
You work mostly outside AWS or want a chat that can switch between different AI models.
