ATZ CRM
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
Zoho Recruit is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for ATZ CRM.
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how ATZ CRM compares to 9 alternative apps you can switch to.
Zoho Recr...Best FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$300/yr
BullhornWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--The staffing industry standard with deep CRM automation, but requires 10x the implementation cost and dedicated admin support.
CrelateWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Crelate upgrades you from ATZ's transaction-focused tracking to true relationship-driven recruiting with superior sourcing pipelines and client management.
JobadderWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--JobAdder offers deeper candidate sourcing CRM capabilities than ATZ, but carries agency-level complexity and pricing unsuited to casual internal hiring.
KulaWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Kula automates candidate sourcing with AI-powered sequences while ATZ relies on manual database searches, cutting sourcing time by half for high-volume roles.Zoho Recruit and Bullhorn selected for comparison.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
$300
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $4,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $12,000 estimated migration cost.
--
72/100
Small to midsize teams benefit from affordable pricing and tight Zoho ecosystem integration, but staffing agencies handling 100+ requisitions monthly often hit workflow limits. The interface prioritizes functionality over aesthetics, which slows adoption among hiring managers used to consumer-grade apps.
70/100
Staffing firms and enterprise talent acquisition teams benefit most from Bullhorn's deep automation and CRM capabilities. Small startups and companies with straightforward hiring needs will struggle with the platform's complexity and cost. The extensive customization options require dedicated administrators and lengthy onboarding to configure effectively.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Zoho Recruit is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 3 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
low
Bullhorn is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 10 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
4.4/5.0
2500 reviews
4.2/5.0
3200 reviews
No migration needed
3 weeks
High
Zoho Recruit is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 3 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
10 weeks
High
Bullhorn is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 10 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
$4,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$12,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
--
100%
0%
0%
--
--
You already standardize on this app.
Choose if you prioritize tight Zoho CRM integration and need affordable core ATS functionality without premium price tags.
Choose if you run a staffing agency or high-volume recruiting requiring enterprise-grade automation and CRM capabilities.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
Avoid if your recruiters depend on slick mobile apps for field interviews or require sophisticated drip campaigns for passive talent.
Avoid if you need a lightweight, plug-and-play ATS without implementation overhead and dedicated admin resources.
