Akto
Current- Annual cost
- $1,089
- Seats assigned
- $1,089/yr
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Aikido Security is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Akto.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Akto compares to 14 alternative apps you can switch to.
Aikido Se...Best FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Aikido trades API depth for breadth—one platform covering code to cloud, but sacrifices runtime API protection and business logic testing.
WallarmWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$6,000/yr
WizWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Wiz delivers unmatched cloud-wide visibility without agents, but forces you to sacrifice deep API security testing and runtime protection capabilities.
ActitoWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Actito offers zero functional overlap with Akto; switching requires abandoning API security entirely for marketing automation capabilities.
AcunetixWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Mature web scanner with fast detection speeds, but lacks runtime API protection and agentic AI capabilities needed for modern architectures.
ApiableWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Apiable turns APIs into products with beautiful portals, but offers zero security testing — fundamentally different category than Akto.
Salt Secu...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Salt Security is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
Cequence ...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Cequence Security is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
InvictiNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Invicti is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
OpentextNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Opentext is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Aikido Security and Wallarm selected for comparison.
$1,188
Starter ($99/month)
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$6,000
Fast
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $2,500 estimated migration cost.
-$26,436
After $12,000 estimated migration cost.
--
75/100
Aikido suits lean engineering teams and startups needing broad security coverage without multiple point solutions. Dedicated application security teams requiring deep API-specific runtime protection and business logic testing will find it insufficient. The platform consolidates scanners but lacks Akto's specialized agentic AI testing for API endpoints.
50/100
Wallarm excels for security operations teams needing WAAP and bot management in production environments. It prioritizes real-time attack blocking over developer-integrated testing workflows. Less suited for teams wanting CI/CD-native security scanning and developer remediation tools.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Aikido Security is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $2,500 one-time cost.
low
Wallarm is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
4.5/5.0
53 reviews
4.6/5.0
--
67 reviews
No migration needed
2 weeks
High
Aikido Security is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $2,500 one-time cost.
8 weeks
High
Wallarm is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
$2,500
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$12,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
--
Supports 42 native integrations.
100%
0%
45%
--
You already standardize on this app.
You need broad application security coverage (SAST/SCA) across code to cloud rather than specialized API security testing
You require production-grade WAF and bot blocking rather than developer testing automation
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You require runtime API protection, business logic testing, or agentic AI security automation for APIs
Your workflow depends on automated API security testing integrated early in CI/CD pipelines
