ActiveState Platform
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Gitlab is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for ActiveState Platform.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how ActiveState Platform compares to 6 alternative apps you can switch to.
GitlabBest FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--GitLab covers more of ActiveState's security surface than GitHub, but still not secure runtime builds.
GithubStrong ContenderSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--GitHub kills two birds (code + scanning) but makes you rebuild secure runtime delivery yourself. Regulated shops should keep ActiveState.
Azure Dev...Worth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Azure DevOps is a solid Microsoft-native pipeline, but it makes you build the security layer ActiveState ships.
Platform....Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Platform.sh patches runtimes as part of PaaS; ActiveState delivers governance artifacts. Different compliance posture.
CloudbeesNot RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$1,080/yr•$100/month
DagsterNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Dagster is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Gitlab and Github selected for comparison.
--
Platform
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
$348
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$48
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $15,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $15,000 estimated migration cost.
--
65/100
GitLab Ultimate includes dependency scanning, license compliance, and SBOM-ish reporting alongside its pipeline platform. That covers more of ActiveState's security story than GitHub. Still missing: curated secure runtime distributions and tamper-proof builds, so runtime supply-chain control stays manual.
62/100
A team on ActiveState can shift dependency vulnerability scanning to Dependabot and use Actions to install/validate runtimes in CI. What they lose: curated secure distributions, SBOM generation, and policy-driven package approval. At 50+ engineers on GitHub Enterprise, integration is seamless, but runtime governance becomes DIY.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
--
Gitlab is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $15,000 one-time cost.
--
Github is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $15,000 one-time cost.
4.1/5.0
4.5/5.0
22500 reviews
4.7/5.0
85000 reviews
No migration needed
6 weeks
Medium
Gitlab is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $15,000 one-time cost.
6 weeks
Medium
Github is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $15,000 one-time cost.
--
$15,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$15,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
Supports 3,000 native integrations.
--
Supports 10,000 native integrations.
100%
60%
55%
You already standardize on this app.
Choose GitLab Ultimate if you want code, CI/CD, and dependency/license scanning in one platform with ActiveState's runtime governance handled elsewhere.
Choose GitHub if you already standardize on GitHub Enterprise and want dependency scanning folded into your code platform, accepting DIY runtime governance.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
Avoid if tamper-proof builds and curated distributions are non-negotiable compliance requirements.
Avoid GitHub if you need SBOMs, tamper-proof builds, and policy-controlled package approval for compliance (e.g., FedRAMP, regulated industries).
