Doow
Doow
Sign up
ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS

ABSOLUTE SECURITY Alternatives

Should you replace ABSOLUTE SECURITY?

Goodaccess is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for ABSOLUTE SECURITY.

ABSOLUTE SECURITY

Current
Seat-based Payg
0/5
Annual cost
--
Seats assigned
--

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

ABSOLUTE SECURITY alternatives

See how ABSOLUTE SECURITY compares to 13 alternative apps you can switch to.

GoodaccessBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Deploys in hours versus weeks at one-third the cost, but lacks Absolute's unbreakable firmware-level endpoint persistence and recovery.
FortisaseWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--FortiSASE unifies your network and security stack but sacrifices the firmware-layer persistence that makes Absolute unique.
Duo AdminWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Deploy zero trust in days with best-in-class MFA, but lose firmware-embedded persistence and offline asset recovery capabilities.
ZscalerWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Zscaler replaces your VPN with cloud-delivered zero trust, but loses Absolute's firmware persistence that survives OS reinstalls.
Axis Secu...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--AXIS delivers faster remote access than Absolute's VPN-dependent ZTNA but sacrifices the firmware persistence that survives disk wipes.
Perimeter...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Perimeter 81 deploys cloud-native ZTNA in days versus weeks, but lacks Absolute's unremovable firmware implant for extreme endpoint resilience.
VmwareWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--VMware offers superior cross-platform support but loses devices during OS reimaging without Absolute's firmware persistence.
CiscoWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Cisco offers deeper threat intelligence than Absolute but loses devices if the OS is wiped, lacking that firmware-layer resilience.
Cloudflar...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Swap firmware depth for network speed: Cloudflare deploys global ZTNA in days at half the cost, but loses device recovery if drives are wiped.
InstasafeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--InstaSafe deploys Zero Trust in hours versus weeks, but cannot recover or wipe devices if the OS is compromised unlike Absolute's firmware anchor.
NordlayerWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--NordLayer trades device control for deployment speed — instant ZTNA without firmware complexity, but zero persistence when laptops go missing or get wiped.
Citrix Cl...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Citrix Cloud is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
PuredomeNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Puredome is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.

Goodaccess and Fortisase selected for comparison.

Annual costTotal subscription cost for each app, shown for the selected billing period.
ABSOLUTE ...

--

Public pricing

Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.

Goodaccess

--

Public pricing

Public catalog pricing estimate.

Fortisase

--

Public pricing

Public catalog pricing estimate.

3-Year Net SavingEstimated savings over three years after migration and setup costs.
ABSOLUTE ...

$0

No migration in the current app baseline.

Goodaccess

--

After $2,500 estimated migration cost.

Fortisase

--

After $12,000 estimated migration cost.

Team Fit ScoreHow closely the app matches the teams, workflows, and usage patterns currently in place.
ABSOLUTE ...

--

Goodaccess

70/100

Small to mid-sized IT teams adopt GoodAccess rapidly for simple cloud VPN replacement without hardware overhead. Enterprise security teams requiring firmware-level persistence and remote device lock will find it inadequate for comprehensive endpoint protection.

Fortisase

70/100

FortiSASE suits organizations consolidating SD-WAN, ZTNA, and SWG into one cloud stack. Security architects benefit from unified policy frameworks, but teams seeking only firmware-level endpoint resilience will find it unnecessarily complex.

Adoption RiskExpected friction, training effort, and behavior change needed to move teams onto the alternative.
ABSOLUTE ...

--

Public adoption signal for the current app.

Goodaccess

low

Goodaccess is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $2,500 one-time cost.

Fortisase

low

Fortisase is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.

User satisfactionAvailable rating and review signal for team sentiment around the app.
ABSOLUTE ...

--

650 reviews

Goodaccess

4.7/5.0

Fortisase

4.3/5.0

Timeline & DisruptionExpected migration duration and disruption to normal workflows.
ABSOLUTE ...

No migration needed

Goodaccess

2 weeks

High

Goodaccess is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $2,500 one-time cost.

Fortisase

8 weeks

High

Fortisase is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.

Setup & trainingOne-time implementation, enablement, and training investment required.
ABSOLUTE ...

--

Goodaccess

$2,500

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Fortisase

$12,000

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Integration CoverageHow much of the current integration and workflow surface is covered by the app.
ABSOLUTE ...

100%

Supports 150 native integrations.

Goodaccess

--

Fortisase

--

Feature Match (%)How closely the app matches current feature needs, including notable gaps or risks.
ABSOLUTE ...

100%

Goodaccess

0%

  • No firmware-embedded persistence for device recovery
  • Lacks remote device wipe and lock capabilities
  • Missing asset intelligence and geolocation tracking
  • No automated endpoint hygiene monitoring
Fortisase

0%

  • No firmware-embedded persistence for offline recovery
  • Requires constant cloud connectivity for policy enforcement
  • Complex multi-week deployment versus agent-only installation
  • Agent-based ZTNA vulnerable to OS-level compromise
  • Lacks self-healing endpoint capabilities without network access
CertificationsSecurity, privacy, and compliance certifications available for each app.
ABSOLUTE ...
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001FIPS 140-2FedRAMPGDPR
Goodaccess

--

Fortisase

--

Choose This IfThe conditions where keeping or switching to this app is likely to make sense.
ABSOLUTE ...

You already standardize on this app.

Goodaccess

You need quick-to-deploy secure remote access without firmware-level endpoint resilience requirements

Fortisase

You need to consolidate networking and security (SD-WAN + ZTNA + SWG) rather than just endpoint resilience

Avoid This IfThe conditions where this app is likely to create cost, workflow, or adoption risk.
ABSOLUTE ...

Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.

Goodaccess

You require firmware-embedded persistence, remote device wipe, or comprehensive endpoint compliance monitoring

Fortisase

You require firmware-layer persistence and offline asset recovery when devices are compromised

ABSOLUTE SECURITY Alternatives | Doow