Dig
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
Guardz is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Dig.
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Dig compares to 14 alternative apps you can switch to.
GuardzBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Replaces six security vendors with one MSP login at half the cost, but locks you into SentinelOne and Check Point subsystems.
DruvaWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Cut backup TCO by 40% replacing legacy appliances with immutable cloud storage and zero hardware maintenance.
DigifyWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Provides document-level intelligence and control that email attachments lack, but expect to pay 5x more per user than standard cloud storage.
DigisignWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--DigiSign cuts signature costs by 60% for ASEAN compliance, but forces you to abandon advanced CRM integrations and AI analytics.
VirtruWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Virtru delivers FedRAMP-authorized encryption at half the cost of legacy DLP suites while maintaining persistent control over data shared outside your organization.
SysdigWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Sysdig CNAPP includes DSPM but forces you to pay for full runtime security infrastructure.
DigiboxxWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Sovereign Indian cloud with built-in Aadhaar e-sign costs 60% less than global competitors, but expect limited integrations and India-centric latency.
SolvoNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Solvo is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Guardz and Druva selected for comparison.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Contact Sales
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
--
After $12,000 estimated migration cost.
--
70/100
Guardz is architected specifically for Managed Service Providers managing multi-tenant SMB security portfolios. Enterprise IT teams seeking direct internal security coverage will struggle with its MSP-centric workflows and opaque pricing. The platform excels when delivered as a managed service but creates friction for self-service internal deployment.
78/100
IT and security teams benefit most from Druva's fully managed SaaS model, eliminating hardware maintenance overhead. Organizations with heavy on-premise legacy workloads or strict offline requirements will struggle with its cloud-only architecture. The platform excels for distributed teams needing centralized backup across M365, AWS, and endpoints.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Guardz is a high-complexity migration.
low
Druva is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
850 reviews
4.7/5.0
1200 reviews
--
2150 reviews
No migration needed
--
High
Guardz is a high-complexity migration.
6 weeks
High
Druva is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
--
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$12,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 400 native integrations.
19%
Supports 75 native integrations.
46%
Supports 185 native integrations.
100%
--
--
You already standardize on this app.
You are an MSP consolidating multiple security vendors into a unified per-user platform with 24/7 MDR.
You want to eliminate backup hardware and consolidate protection for cloud, SaaS, and endpoints under one SaaS platform
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You require transparent self-service procurement or are not operating as an MSP managing external clients.
You operate in fully air-gapped environments without internet access or require on-premise hardware for compliance
