Boman.ai
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Aikido Security is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Boman.ai.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Boman.ai compares to 7 alternative apps you can switch to.
Aikido Se...Best FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Consolidates six security scanners into one dashboard at 40% lower cost than standalone tools, but with less mature attack surface monitoring.
CodethreatWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--CodeThreat cuts noise with AI false-positive elimination at $39/seat, delivering faster developer adoption than legacy AppSec gatekeeping.
CycodeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Cycode delivers agentic AI and supply chain security that scales beyond Boman.ai, but requires enterprise resources to implement effectively.
ApiiroWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Apiiro pioneers agentic AI code security with automated fixes via Risk Graph, but requires heavy configuration vs. lightweight continuous testing.
Beagle Se...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Beagle offers transparent usage-based pricing per test rather than per target, cutting costs for DAST-heavy workflows but omitting SAST entirely.
BitoWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Bito trades Boman's risk dashboards for instant AI code review, accelerating developer remediation but sacrificing centralized AppSec governance.Aikido Security and Codethreat selected for comparison.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Contact Sales
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $4,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $3,500 estimated migration cost.
--
76/100
Engineering teams adopt Aikido quickly due to its unified scanner approach and low false-positive rates, while enterprise security teams may struggle with its limited policy customization compared to legacy tools. The platform excels at consolidating findings but lacks the granular control mature AppSec programs require.
82/100
CodeThreat excels for engineering teams wanting AI-driven PR reviews and false positive reduction without complex onboarding. Security teams benefit from fast SAST/SCA integration, but organizations needing full application attack surface management or legacy governance workflows may find coverage narrower than comprehensive AppSec platforms.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Aikido Security is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
low
Codethreat is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 3 weeks and $3,500 one-time cost.
--
12 reviews
4.6/5.0
320 reviews
--
120 reviews
No migration needed
4 weeks
High
Aikido Security is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
3 weeks
High
Codethreat is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 3 weeks and $3,500 one-time cost.
--
$4,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$3,500
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 4 native integrations.
100%
Supports 85 native integrations.
100%
Supports 45 native integrations.
100%
0%
0%
--
You already standardize on this app.
You want to consolidate SAST, SCA and secrets scanning into a single developer-friendly platform with integrated autofix capabilities.
You want immediate AI-powered PR security reviews and transparent per-contributor pricing without enterprise sales cycles.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You require mature external attack surface assessment or complex policy-based risk scoring beyond code repositories.
You require comprehensive application attack surface monitoring beyond source code or mature policy-based risk governance workflows.
