Azure Sql
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Amazon Rds is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Azure Sql.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Azure Sql compares to 2 alternative apps you can switch to.
Amazon RdsBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Trade Azure's hands-free automation for RDS's engine choice and AWS integration, but budget for DBA overhead.Amazon Rds and Ovh selected for comparison.
--
DTU Basic
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
On-Demand DB Instances
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $12,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $12,000 estimated migration cost.
--
75/100
Engineering teams with DBA resources benefit from granular control and engine flexibility, but smaller teams without database administrators struggle with manual tuning requirements. Organizations seeking zero-maintenance databases find RDS too operationally demanding compared to Azure SQL's fully managed PaaS.
55/100
Development teams seeking open-source database engines and lower TCO will find OVHcloud attractive, particularly with its strong EU data residency. However, organizations deeply integrated with Microsoft SQL Server, Active Directory, and .NET applications will face expensive refactoring and loss of enterprise security features.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Amazon Rds is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
medium
Ovh is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
2800 reviews
--
8750 reviews
--
4200 reviews
No migration needed
6 weeks
High
Amazon Rds is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
6 weeks
High
Ovh is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
$12,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$12,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 340 native integrations.
100%
Supports 350 native integrations.
53%
Supports 180 native integrations.
100%
0%
0%
You already standardize on this app.
You require database engine flexibility (PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle) and deep AWS ecosystem integration.
You require significantly lower infrastructure costs and are willing to migrate from SQL Server to PostgreSQL or MySQL.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You rely on automatic performance tuning, serverless scaling, and zero-downtime maintenance windows without DBA resources.
You depend on T-SQL, Azure AD integration, or require fully managed elastic scaling and hyperscale storage.
