Doow
Doow
Sign up
ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS

Arcserve Alternatives

Should you replace Arcserve?

Veeam is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Arcserve.

Arcserve

Current
Seat-based Payg
0/5
Annual cost
--
Seats assigned
--

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Arcserve alternatives

See how Arcserve compares to 11 alternative apps you can switch to.

VeeamBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Veeam cuts VM recovery to minutes with deeper cloud tiering, though you'll sacrifice Arcserve's unified appliance deployment and built-in DR orchestration.
DattoWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Datto exclusively serves MSPs with all-inclusive pricing and unlimited support, trading direct procurement flexibility for guaranteed margins and white-glove partner enablement Arcserve cannot match.
AxcientWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Axcient eliminates backup chains to cut recovery time by 70%, but locks you into their proprietary cloud unlike Arcserve's flexible storage options.
AcronisWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Acronis fuses backup with active ransomware defense, trading Arcserve's deployment simplicity for integrated cyber protection and higher system requirements.
BdrcloudWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--BDRCloud trades Arcserve's granular DR control for zero-maintenance SaaS delivery, cutting deployment time from weeks to hours.
BackblazeWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$70/yr$7/monthBackblaze cuts backup costs by 80% but sacrifices Arcserve's disaster recovery orchestration and bare-metal restore capabilities.
OwnbackupWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--OwnBackup delivers surgical SaaS data recovery that Arcserve can't match for Salesforce, but leaves your laptops and servers completely unprotected.
AvepointWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Trade Arcserve's infrastructure depth for native Microsoft 365 granularity, but lose physical server and VM backup capabilities entirely.
NinjarmmWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--NinjaOne forces a choice between endpoint control and backup depth — you gain RMM capabilities but lose Arcserve's disaster recovery specialization.
RewindWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$150/yr$15/monthZero-infrastructure SaaS backup halves management overhead but leaves servers and VMs completely exposed.
CloudallyNot RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$54/yr$5/monthCloudally is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.

Veeam and Datto selected for comparison.

Annual costTotal subscription cost for each app, shown for the selected billing period.
Arcserve

--

Arcserve Unified Data Protection

Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.

Veeam

--

Veeam Data Platform Foundation

Public catalog pricing estimate.

Datto

--

Datto SIRIS

Public catalog pricing estimate.

3-Year Net SavingEstimated savings over three years after migration and setup costs.
Arcserve

$0

No migration in the current app baseline.

Veeam

--

After $3,500 estimated migration cost.

Datto

--

After $5,000 estimated migration cost.

Team Fit ScoreHow closely the app matches the teams, workflows, and usage patterns currently in place.
Arcserve

--

Veeam

88/100

Veeam excels in virtualized and cloud-first environments where teams prioritize rapid recovery over hardware simplicity, particularly for VMware and Hyper-V shops. IT administrators adopt it quickly due to familiar interfaces and robust PowerShell automation, though organizations with deep legacy physical tape libraries often struggle compared to Arcserve's unified physical-to-cloud management.

Datto

82/100

Datto exclusively serves managed service providers, making it perfect for outsourced IT firms seeking recurring revenue but inaccessible to organizations requiring direct vendor relationships. MSPs benefit from white-label support and guaranteed margins, while internal IT teams needing self-managed infrastructure will find the partner-only model prohibitive.

Adoption RiskExpected friction, training effort, and behavior change needed to move teams onto the alternative.
Arcserve

--

Public adoption signal for the current app.

Veeam

low

Veeam is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $3,500 one-time cost.

Datto

low

Datto is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $5,000 one-time cost.

User satisfactionAvailable rating and review signal for team sentiment around the app.
Arcserve

--

600 reviews

Veeam

--

15600 reviews

Datto

--

12500 reviews

Timeline & DisruptionExpected migration duration and disruption to normal workflows.
Arcserve

No migration needed

Veeam

4 weeks

High

Veeam is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $3,500 one-time cost.

Datto

6 weeks

High

Datto is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $5,000 one-time cost.

Setup & trainingOne-time implementation, enablement, and training investment required.
Arcserve

--

Veeam

$3,500

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Datto

$5,000

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Integration CoverageHow much of the current integration and workflow surface is covered by the app.
Arcserve

100%

Supports 120 native integrations.

Veeam

100%

Supports 450 native integrations.

Datto

100%

Supports 250 native integrations.

Feature Match (%)How closely the app matches current feature needs, including notable gaps or risks.
Arcserve

100%

Veeam

0%

  • Advanced DR orchestration requires separate Availability Orchestrator license
  • Limited turnkey hardware appliance options versus integrated UDP
  • Weaker native support for legacy physical Unix systems
  • Separate product/console required for SaaS backup beyond workloads
Datto

0%

  • Exclusive MSP channel prevents direct enterprise procurement
  • Requires proprietary hardware appliances for flagship BCDR tiers
  • Limited self-service without partner intermediary involvement
  • Higher entry cost for smaller deployments vs software-only solutions
CertificationsSecurity, privacy, and compliance certifications available for each app.
Arcserve
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAA
Veeam
SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR
Datto
SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR
Choose This IfThe conditions where keeping or switching to this app is likely to make sense.
Arcserve

You already standardize on this app.

Veeam

Your infrastructure is heavily virtualized or cloud-first and recovery speed outweighs all-in-one hardware simplicity

Datto

You are an MSP seeking exclusive partner pricing, white-glove support, and recurring revenue streams without vendor competition for your clients.

Avoid This IfThe conditions where this app is likely to create cost, workflow, or adoption risk.
Arcserve

Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.

Veeam

You depend on turnkey hardware appliances with native DR orchestration and extensive legacy tape integration

Datto

Your organization requires direct procurement from the vendor or manages backup infrastructure internally without MSP intermediaries.

Arcserve Alternatives | Doow