Apphive
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Glide is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Apphive.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Apphive compares to 6 alternative apps you can switch to.
GlideBest FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Glide trades native app store distribution for spreadsheet-powered speed, making it ideal for internal tools but unsuitable for consumer mobile products.
AdaloWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Adalo uniquely ships web + mobile together, but stings you with $200 in publishing fees that Apphive bundles free.
ThunkableWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Thunkable's AI-assisted block coding accelerates prototyping, but its subscription-dependent hosting and screen limits create long-term vendor lock-in risks.
Appy Pie ...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Delivers basic apps in days at half the cost, but sacrifices native speed and backend depth compared to Apphive's native stack.
BubbleNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Bubble is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Glide and Adalo selected for comparison.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $4,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $8,500 estimated migration cost.
--
70/100
Glide excels for operations and admin teams who need internal business tools or client portals built quickly from existing spreadsheets. Teams adopt it immediately due to familiar data structures, but product teams requiring consumer-facing native mobile apps will struggle since Glide only outputs Progressive Web Apps, not native iOS/Android binaries for app stores.
71/100
Adalo suits indie makers and small agencies building MVPs that need both web and mobile presence without code. Engineering-heavy teams and startups requiring complex backend logic or high-performance native integrations typically abandon it within 3–6 months due to database scaling limits and customization constraints.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Glide is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
low
Adalo is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,500 one-time cost.
--
150 reviews
4.7/5.0
2847 reviews
--
850 reviews
No migration needed
4 weeks
High
Glide is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
6 weeks
High
Adalo is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,500 one-time cost.
--
$4,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$8,500
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 85 native integrations.
100%
Supports 150 native integrations.
94%
Supports 80 native integrations.
100%
0%
0%
You already standardize on this app.
You prioritize rapid internal tool creation over native mobile app store distribution and device hardware access
You need both web and mobile apps from a single project without managing separate codebases
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You require true native iOS/Android binaries published to the Apple App Store or Google Play with full offline capabilities
You require complex native device integrations or want to avoid per-app publishing fees
