Azure Devops
Current- Annual cost
- $60
- Seats assigned
- $60/yr
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Github is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Azure Devops.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Azure Devops compares to 9 alternative apps you can switch to.
GithubBest FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--GitHub cuts platform complexity while adding the industry's deepest integration ecosystem and AI coding tools.
GitlabStrong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--GitLab consolidates six DevOps tools into one license, cutting stack complexity but requiring Git fluency from day one.
Google Cl...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Trade Azure's integrated DevOps suite for GCP's infrastructure scale, but budget extra for Jira licenses to fill the planning gap.
CloudbeesWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$1,080/yr•$100/month
Microsoft...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Microsoft Azure is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
DagsterNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Dagster is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.Github and Gitlab selected for comparison.
$72
Basic ($6/month)
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
$48
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
-$3,928
After $4,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $12,000 estimated migration cost.
--
80/100
GitHub excels for development teams prioritizing velocity and modern git workflows, offering a superior developer experience and the industry's largest open-source ecosystem. While it matches Azure DevOps on CI/CD and version control, it trades enterprise project governance for speed and collaboration. Teams will gain better code review tools but lose robust test management and portfolio planning capabilities.
75/100
GitLab excels for teams seeking a unified DevSecOps workflow with built-in security scanning and container management, eliminating tool sprawl. However, organizations deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem may find integration friction and miss Azure-native features like Boards' advanced test planning. It demands higher DevOps maturity to fully leverage its integrated toolchain.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Github is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
low
Gitlab is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
18500 reviews
4.7/5.0
85000 reviews
4.5/5.0
22500 reviews
No migration needed
4 weeks
Low
Github is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
6 weeks
Low
Gitlab is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $12,000 one-time cost.
--
$4,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$12,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 1,800 native integrations.
100%
Supports 10,000 native integrations.
100%
Supports 3,000 native integrations.
100%
75%
82%
You already standardize on this app.
Your team prioritizes developer experience and open-source collaboration over enterprise project governance
You want security scanning and container registry natively integrated with CI/CD without separate tool licenses.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You require TFVC, formal test case management, or advanced portfolio-level agile planning
You rely heavily on TFVC, Azure Boards' advanced test planning, or tight integration with Azure Active Directory and Office 365.
