Atlassian
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Jira is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Atlassian.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Atlassian compares to 13 alternative apps you can switch to.
JiraBest FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Jira remains the gold standard for issue tracking, but requires additional Atlassian products to match the full ecosystem's breadth.
AsanaWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Asana sacrifices technical depth for superior usability, making it ideal for business teams but insufficient for software engineering workflows.
Activecol...Worth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$140/yr•$14/month
ConfluenceNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Confluence is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
AssemblaNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Assembla is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
FullviewNot RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$948/yr•$99/month
AteraNot RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$89/yr•$99/month
HelpwiseNot RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$190/yr•$19/monthJira and Asana selected for comparison.
--
Free
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
$98
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$132
Personal
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $2,500 estimated migration cost.
--
After $8,000 estimated migration cost.
--
75/100
Jira excels at structured issue tracking and sprint management for engineering teams but strips away the integrated documentation, code repository, and video messaging found in the full Atlassian suite. It fits organizations that already maintain separate tools for wikis and DevOps pipelines. Non-technical teams may find the configuration complexity excessive compared to Trello.
65/100
Asana excels for marketing, creative, and operations teams that need intuitive project visualization and workflow automation without technical complexity. It prioritizes ease-of-use and cross-functional transparency over developer-centric capabilities. However, engineering teams will miss Jira's granular agile support, advanced querying, and dev tool integrations.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Jira is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $2,500 one-time cost.
low
Asana is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.
4.5/5.0
45000 reviews
4.3/5.0
33000 reviews
4.4/5.0
48000 reviews
No migration needed
4 weeks
Low
Jira is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $2,500 one-time cost.
4 weeks
High
Asana is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.
--
$2,500
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$8,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
Supports 4,000 native integrations.
--
Supports 300 native integrations.
100%
60%
45%
--
You already standardize on this app.
You need enterprise-grade issue tracking and agile boards without the overhead of integrated documentation or code hosting
Choose if your organization prioritizes intuitive user experience and cross-functional visibility over technical developer tooling and complex workflow automation.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You require native knowledge management, ITSM service desks, or built-in video messaging in one unified platform
Avoid if your teams rely on JQL querying, integrated code management, CI/CD pipelines, or IT service management functionality.
