Doow
Doow
Sign up
ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS

Ashby Alternatives

Should you replace Ashby?

Zoho Recruit is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Ashby.

Ashby

Current
Seat-based Payg
4.7/5
Annual cost
$2,400
1 seat / $200/month
Seats assigned
$2,400/yr

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Ashby alternatives

See how Ashby compares to 18 alternative apps you can switch to.

Zoho Recr...Best FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$300/yrZoho Recruit delivers core ATS functionality at half Ashby's price, ideal for staffing agencies and budget-conscious teams.
GemStrong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Gem dominates proactive sourcing with 800M+ profiles while Ashby wins on hiring operations and financial planning integrations.
Atz CrmStrong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--ATZ cuts costs for simple hiring tracks but drops Ashby's AI sourcing and predictive hiring intelligence.
Moka AtsStrong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Moka offers China-specific recruiting power at 40% less cost, but lacks Ashby's AI sourcing and global analytics depth.
SproutsaiWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--SproutsAI cuts sourcing time by half but forces trade-offs on strategic planning and configurability.
HirevueWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--HireVue enhances screening efficiency but cannot replace Ashby's ATS core; deploy as an assessment add-on, not a migration target.
HandshakeWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Handshake dominates campus recruiting but lacks the AI sourcing and CRM depth to replace Ashby for full-cycle hiring.
Keka HrNot RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$1,089/yr$99/monthKeka Hr is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
CalendlyNot RecommendedSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Calendly is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
PaycomNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Paycom is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
RipplingNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Rippling is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
PaylocityNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Paylocity is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
Adp Workf...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Adp Workforce Now is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
LesshireNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Lesshire is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
Applicant...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Applicant Ai is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
DayforceNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Dayforce is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
JotformNot RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Jotform is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.
Atomic Hi...Not RecommendedPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Atomic Hire is not a strong catalog fit based on public pricing, migration, or product-fit signals.

Zoho Recruit and Gem selected for comparison.

Annual costTotal subscription cost for each app, shown for the selected billing period.
Ashby

$2,400

Starter ($200/month)

Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.

Zoho Recr...

$300

Free

Public catalog pricing estimate.

Gem

--

Growth

Public catalog pricing estimate.

3-Year Net SavingEstimated savings over three years after migration and setup costs.
Ashby

$0

No migration in the current app baseline.

Zoho Recr...

-$1,700

After $8,000 estimated migration cost.

Gem

--

After $8,500 estimated migration cost.

Team Fit ScoreHow closely the app matches the teams, workflows, and usage patterns currently in place.
Ashby

--

Zoho Recr...

65/100

Zoho Recruit excels for staffing agencies and mid-market companies needing affordable applicant tracking with solid workflow automation. It integrates deeply with the Zoho ecosystem but lacks the strategic hiring intelligence and modern UX that high-growth startups require.

Gem

75/100

Gem excels for talent acquisition teams prioritizing proactive candidate sourcing and relationship management with its database of 800M+ profiles and powerful Chrome extension. Its AI-first approach streamlines outbound recruiting workflows, though it lacks Ashby's sophisticated interactive headcount planning and quality-of-hire analytics capabilities.

Adoption RiskExpected friction, training effort, and behavior change needed to move teams onto the alternative.
Ashby

--

Public adoption signal for the current app.

Zoho Recr...

low

Zoho Recruit is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.

Gem

low

Gem is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,500 one-time cost.

User satisfactionAvailable rating and review signal for team sentiment around the app.
Ashby

4.7/5.0

850 reviews

Zoho Recr...

4.4/5.0

4500 reviews

Gem

4.8/5.0

1850 reviews

Timeline & DisruptionExpected migration duration and disruption to normal workflows.
Ashby

No migration needed

Zoho Recr...

6 weeks

Low

Zoho Recruit is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.

Gem

6 weeks

Low

Gem is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,500 one-time cost.

Setup & trainingOne-time implementation, enablement, and training investment required.
Ashby

--

Zoho Recr...

$8,000

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Gem

$8,500

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Integration CoverageHow much of the current integration and workflow surface is covered by the app.
Ashby

100%

Supports 90 native integrations.

Zoho Recr...

100%

Supports 250 native integrations.

Gem

83%

Supports 75 native integrations.

Feature Match (%)How closely the app matches current feature needs, including notable gaps or risks.
Ashby

100%

Zoho Recr...

65%

  • Limited quality-of-hire and strategic analytics dashboards
  • Basic sourcing Chrome extension compared to Ashby's AI
  • No interactive headcount planning capabilities
  • Weaker diversity analytics and pipeline insights
Gem

70%

  • Newer native ATS with less mature workflow depth
  • No integrated financial headcount planning
  • Limited post-hire quality tracking analytics
  • Steeper learning curve for hiring managers
CertificationsSecurity, privacy, and compliance certifications available for each app.
Ashby
SOC 2 Type II
Zoho Recr...
ISO 27001GDPR
Gem
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCCPA
Choose This IfThe conditions where keeping or switching to this app is likely to make sense.
Ashby

You already standardize on this app.

Zoho Recr...

You need an affordable ATS with strong staffing capabilities and Zoho ecosystem integration

Gem

Your recruiting strategy relies heavily on outbound sourcing and proactive talent pipelining

Avoid This IfThe conditions where this app is likely to create cost, workflow, or adoption risk.
Ashby

Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.

Zoho Recr...

You require advanced quality-of-hire analytics and strategic workforce planning tools

Gem

You require integrated headcount planning and quality-of-hire analytics tied to business outcomes