Angular Material
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Htmx is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Angular Material.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Angular Material compares to 1 alternative apps you can switch to.
Htmx selected for comparison.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Public pricing
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $100,000 estimated migration cost.
--
65/100
Backend developers adopt htmx rapidly to add interactivity without learning modern JavaScript frameworks. Frontend teams invested in Angular's ecosystem will struggle because htmx requires abandoning component-based architecture for server-rendered HTML. The shift eliminates build steps but demands significant backend refactoring.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Htmx is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 20 weeks and $100,000 one-time cost.
4.4/5.0
1850 reviews
--
No migration needed
20 weeks
High
Htmx is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 20 weeks and $100,000 one-time cost.
--
$100,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 150 native integrations.
--
100%
0%
--
--
You already standardize on this app.
You want to eliminate JavaScript build steps and favor server-rendered HTML over SPA complexity
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You depend on Angular's ecosystem, Material Design components, or complex client-side state management
