Amazon Aurora Serverless V2
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Google Cloud Sql is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Amazon Aurora Serverless V2.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Amazon Aurora Serverless V2 compares to 8 alternative apps you can switch to.
Google Cl...Best FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$320/yr
Cockroach...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Cockroachdb is a good fit if: you require geographically distributed data with serializable consistency and horizontal write scaling.
Planetsca...Worth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Planetscale is a good fit if: your team uses MySQL, values Git-like schema branching workflows, and doesn't rely on foreign keys or stored procedures.
Azure Sql...Worth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$5,400/yr
Amazon Dy...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Amazon Dynamodb is a good fit if: you require consistent single-digit millisecond latency at any scale with fully managed infrastructure.Google Cloud Sql and Cockroachdb selected for comparison.
--
Aurora Serverless v2
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
$320
Enterprise
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
CockroachDB Basic
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $15,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $25,000 estimated migration cost.
--
55/100
DevOps teams running steady-state applications within GCP find Cloud SQL operationally simple with seamless GKE and BigQuery integration. However, platform engineers accustomed to AWS serverless patterns will struggle with manual capacity planning and resizing delays. Organizations with spiky workloads face over-provisioning costs or availability risks during scale-up.
55/100
Platform and backend engineering teams building multi-region applications benefit from CockroachDB's horizontal scaling and survival goals. Teams fully committed to AWS-native architectures with simple single-region needs will find Aurora Serverless V2's IAM integration and AWS ecosystem connectivity smoother to operate. Infrastructure teams must invest significant time learning distributed SQL concepts.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
medium
Google Cloud Sql is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $15,000 one-time cost.
high
Cockroachdb is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 12 weeks and $25,000 one-time cost.
3.5/5.0
1 reviews
4.5/5.0
1850 reviews
--
175 reviews
No migration needed
6 weeks
High
Google Cloud Sql is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $15,000 one-time cost.
12 weeks
High
Cockroachdb is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 12 weeks and $25,000 one-time cost.
--
$15,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$25,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
--
--
Supports 200 native integrations.
--
Supports 200 native integrations.
100%
70%
75%
You already standardize on this app.
Your workload has predictable, steady-state resource requirements and you prioritize native GCP integration over serverless flexibility
You require geographically distributed data with serializable consistency and horizontal write scaling
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
Your application experiences volatile traffic patterns requiring instant scaling or you need true serverless pay-per-use with scale-to-zero capability
Your application relies heavily on PostgreSQL stored procedures, AWS IAM auth, or simple single-region vertical scaling
