Alibaba Cloud Block Storage
Current- Annual cost
- --
- Seats assigned
- --
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Google Cloud Persistent Disk is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Alibaba Cloud Block Storage.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Alibaba Cloud Block Storage compares to 6 alternative apps you can switch to.
Google Cl...Best FitPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Google Cloud Persistent Disk is a good fit if: you require durable, replicated block storage for Google Cloud virtual machines and Kubernetes clusters with enterprise snapshot policies.
Azure Dis...Strong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Microsoft ecosystem integration is seamless, but peak storage performance is lower than Alibaba's top tier.
Amazon EbsStrong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--AWS EBS delivers superior global infrastructure maturity and third-party tooling support, though expect higher egress costs and single-AZ limitations compared to Alibaba.
Ibm Cloud...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Ibm Cloud Block Storage is a good fit if: you run IBM Cloud virtual machines or Kubernetes clusters requiring consistent low-latency block storage.
Digitaloc...Low Risk SwitchSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$1,200/yrGoogle Cloud Persistent Disk and Azure Disk Storage selected for comparison.
--
ESSD AutoPL
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
--
Google Cloud Persistent Disk (Usage-Based)
Public catalog pricing estimate.
--
Ultra Disk Storage
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
--
After $20,000 estimated migration cost.
--
After $8,000 estimated migration cost.
--
95/100
Google Cloud Persistent Disk is foundational block storage for engineering teams running Compute Engine and GKE workloads. It delivers high availability and snapshot capabilities for cloud-native applications but offers no direct utility to marketing, sales, or support teams as it is strictly infrastructure. DevOps teams benefit from automated disk management and live resize features.
75/100
Azure Disk Storage is ideal for organizations already embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem with Active Directory and Azure-native workloads. DevOps teams will appreciate the seamless Terraform and Ansible provider support alongside familiar Azure Monitor integration. However, teams transitioning from Alibaba Cloud may find the performance tiering and China-region compliance requirements significantly different.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Google Cloud Persistent Disk is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $20,000 one-time cost.
low
Azure Disk Storage is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.
--
28 reviews
4.7/5.0
280 reviews
4.3/5.0
1250 reviews
No migration needed
8 weeks
High
Google Cloud Persistent Disk is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 8 weeks and $20,000 one-time cost.
6 weeks
Low
Azure Disk Storage is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 6 weeks and $8,000 one-time cost.
--
$20,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$8,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 65 native integrations.
100%
Supports 150 native integrations.
100%
Supports 400 native integrations.
100%
90%
75%
You already standardize on this app.
You require durable, replicated block storage for Google Cloud virtual machines and Kubernetes clusters with enterprise snapshot policies
You are heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem and require enterprise-grade compliance certifications.
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
You need file-based shared storage (NAS), object storage for unstructured data, or multi-cloud disk portability without migration downtime
You need single-disk IOPS exceeding 160,000 or have primary operations in mainland China.
