Doow
Doow
Sign up
ALTERNATIVE APPLICATIONS

Akeneo Alternatives

Should you replace Akeneo?

Inriver is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Akeneo.

Akeneo

Current
Usage Payg
0/5
Annual cost
--
Seats assigned
--

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Akeneo alternatives

See how Akeneo compares to 6 alternative apps you can switch to.

InriverBest FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$3,600/yrInriver is a good fit if: your organization manages thousands of SKUs across multiple digital channels with complex data governance requirements.
SalsifyWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$30,000/yrSalsify is a good fit if: you are a brand manufacturer managing thousands of SKUs across multiple retail channels requiring GS1 compliance.
PimcoreWorth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Pimcore is a good fit if: you manage complex product data across multiple channels and have technical resources for implementation.
Stibo Sys...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Stibo Systems is a good fit if: you operate a global enterprise requiring governance of complex master data across multiple domains with strict compliance requirements.
SyndigoWorth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$2,400/yrSyndigo is a good fit if: you manage thousands of SKUs across multiple retail channels requiring complex data syndication and governance workflows.
Contentse...Worth ConsideringPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Contentserv is a good fit if: you manage 1000+ SKUs across multiple sales channels and require enterprise-grade data governance.

Inriver and Salsify selected for comparison.

Annual costTotal subscription cost for each app, shown for the selected billing period.
Akeneo

--

Community Edition

Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.

Inriver

$3,600

Growth

Public catalog pricing estimate.

Salsify

$30,000

Growth

Public catalog pricing estimate.

3-Year Net SavingEstimated savings over three years after migration and setup costs.
Akeneo

$0

No migration in the current app baseline.

Inriver

--

After $35,000 estimated migration cost.

Salsify

--

After $35,000 estimated migration cost.

Team Fit ScoreHow closely the app matches the teams, workflows, and usage patterns currently in place.
Akeneo

--

Inriver

75/100

Great for Enterprise Commerce, weak for Simple Catalogs

Salsify

85/100

Salsify dominates for mid-market to enterprise consumer brands managing complex product catalogs across multiple digital shelves. E-commerce and product marketing teams rely on it for syndication to retailers like Amazon and Walmart, but service-based companies or manufacturers with simple catalogs will find it overly complex and expensive. Implementation requires dedicated product content management workflows and cross-functional alignment.

Adoption RiskExpected friction, training effort, and behavior change needed to move teams onto the alternative.
Akeneo

--

Public adoption signal for the current app.

Inriver

high

Inriver is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 16 weeks and $35,000 one-time cost.

Salsify

medium

Salsify is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 12 weeks and $35,000 one-time cost.

User satisfactionAvailable rating and review signal for team sentiment around the app.
Akeneo

--

650 reviews

Inriver

4.1/5.0

425 reviews

Salsify

--

1347 reviews

Timeline & DisruptionExpected migration duration and disruption to normal workflows.
Akeneo

No migration needed

Inriver

16 weeks

High

Inriver is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 16 weeks and $35,000 one-time cost.

Salsify

12 weeks

High

Salsify is a high-complexity migration. Estimated 12 weeks and $35,000 one-time cost.

Setup & trainingOne-time implementation, enablement, and training investment required.
Akeneo

--

Inriver

$35,000

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Salsify

$35,000

Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.

Integration CoverageHow much of the current integration and workflow surface is covered by the app.
Akeneo

100%

Supports 180 native integrations.

Inriver

67%

Supports 120 native integrations.

Salsify

100%

Supports 350 native integrations.

Feature Match (%)How closely the app matches current feature needs, including notable gaps or risks.
Akeneo

100%

Inriver

80%

Salsify

80%

  • No native print catalog management without third-party integration
  • Syndication setup requires technical expertise or professional services
  • Entry tier limits number of SKUs and channels significantly
  • Limited supplier onboarding portals on lower tiers
CertificationsSecurity, privacy, and compliance certifications available for each app.
Akeneo
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPR
Inriver
SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR
Salsify
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCCPA
Choose This IfThe conditions where keeping or switching to this app is likely to make sense.
Akeneo

You already standardize on this app.

Inriver

Your organization manages thousands of SKUs across multiple digital channels with complex data governance requirements

Salsify

You are a brand manufacturer managing thousands of SKUs across multiple retail channels requiring GS1 compliance

Avoid This IfThe conditions where this app is likely to create cost, workflow, or adoption risk.
Akeneo

Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.

Inriver

Your product catalog is small, simple, or you lack dedicated IT resources for implementation

Salsify

You are a service business, have fewer than 500 products, or lack dedicated product content management resources

Akeneo Alternatives | Doow