Adobe Connect
Current- Annual cost
- $590
- Seats assigned
- $590/yr
This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.

Zoom is the strongest catalog alternative to evaluate for Adobe Connect.

This catalog view compares public market data and does not include organization spend or usage.
See how Adobe Connect compares to 7 alternative apps you can switch to.
ZoomBest FitSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Zoom is a good fit if: your organization needs frictionless video conferencing with minimal training and reliable external participant access.
Microsoft...Cost LeaderSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$48/yr•$4/month
Cisco Web...Cost LeaderSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$162/yr
Google Me...Cost LeaderSeat-basedAvg. switch cost--Google Meet is a good fit if: your team lives in Google Workspace and needs simple, browser-based meetings without downloads.
Goto Meet...Strong ContenderPublic pricingAvg. switch cost--Goto Meeting is a good fit if: your organization hosts frequent external client meetings requiring toll-free dial-in, HIPAA compliance, and enterprise-grade security.
BigmarkerStrong ContenderSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$990/yr•$99/month
On24Worth ConsideringSeat-basedAvg. switch cost$4,200/yrZoom and Microsoft Teams selected for comparison.
$600
Meetings ($50/month)
Public catalog pricing. Organization spend is not included.
$228
Free
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$72
Microsoft Teams Essentials ($4/month)
Public catalog pricing estimate.
$0
No migration in the current app baseline.
-$1,884
After $3,000 estimated migration cost.
-$2,416
After $4,000 estimated migration cost.
--
85/100
Zoom dominates for hybrid and remote organizations prioritizing frictionless video quality and broad device compatibility. Sales and customer success teams benefit from its stability and easy external guest access. However, engineering teams deeply embedded in Microsoft 365 or Slack-native workflows may find its persistent chat and document collaboration features less central than competitors.
78/100
Microsoft Teams dominates in corporate environments already using Office 365 due to native integration with Outlook and SharePoint. IT and operations teams appreciate the centralized security and compliance controls. However, agencies and startups that collaborate frequently with external contractors often find the guest access experience cumbersome compared to Slack.
--
Public adoption signal for the current app.
low
Zoom is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $3,000 one-time cost.
medium
Microsoft Teams is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
--
2700 reviews
--
65000 reviews
4.4/5.0
28500 reviews
No migration needed
2 weeks
Low
Zoom is a low-complexity migration. Estimated 2 weeks and $3,000 one-time cost.
4 weeks
Medium
Microsoft Teams is a medium-complexity migration. Estimated 4 weeks and $4,000 one-time cost.
--
$3,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
$4,000
Estimated one-time migration and setup effort.
100%
Supports 85 native integrations.
100%
Supports 2,500 native integrations.
100%
Supports 1,800 native integrations.
100%
85%
80%
You already standardize on this app.
Your organization needs frictionless video conferencing with minimal training and reliable external participant access.
Your organization relies on Microsoft 365 and needs unified video, chat, and document collaboration
Public pricing or fit signals no longer match your needs.
Your team rarely uses video and relies entirely on async chat-based workflows or requires deep native integration with Office 365.
Your team values lightweight, informal communication or frequently collaborates with external partners without dedicated IT support
